Patient–provider discussions about lung cancer screening: Results from the 2012/2013 Kansas Adult Tobacco Survey

نویسندگان

  • Austin R. Rogers
  • Trevor Christensen
  • Ericka M. Welsh
  • Babalola Faseru
چکیده

OBJECTIVE Prior to the 2013 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for lung cancer screening, the American Cancer Society released interim guidance recommending physicians discuss lung cancer screening with high risk patients. We included a question on patient-provider discussions about lung cancer screening on a statewide population-based survey to establish baseline prevalence for surveillance and to identify subpopulation disparities. METHODS We analyzed the 2012/2013 Kansas Adult Tobacco Survey to assess patient-provider discussions about lung cancer screening. Weighted prevalence estimates and adjusted odds ratios were calculated to examine characteristics associated with discussing screening. RESULTS The prevalence of patient-provider discussions about lung cancer screening among current and former smokers aged 55 to 74 years was 31.0% (95% CI 27.0-35.0). The adjusted prevalence odds of having these discussions was higher among males, adults aged 65 to 74 years, adults living with a disability, as well as those who saw a health professional in the past year and had their smoking status assessed or were advised to quit. CONCLUSIONS The current study is unique as it is the first to assess patient-provider discussions about lung cancer screening using a statewide survey. These results may inform strategies to increase patient-provider discussions about lung cancer screening among high risk Kansans.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Patient Perspectives on Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening, New Mexico, 2014

INTRODUCTION National guidelines call for annual lung cancer screening for high-risk smokers using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). The objective of our study was to characterize patient knowledge and attitudes about lung cancer screening, smoking cessation, and shared decision making by patient and health care provider. METHODS We conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with pati...

متن کامل

Patient and primary care provider attitudes and adherence towards lung cancer screening at an academic medical center

Low dose CT (LDCT) for lung cancer screening is an evidence-based, guideline recommended, and Medicare approved test but uptake requires further study. We therefore conducted patient and provider surveys to elucidate factors associated with utilization. Patients referred for LDCT at an academic medical center were questioned about their attitudes, knowledge, and beliefs on lung cancer screening...

متن کامل

Testing a Spanish-language colorectal cancer screening decision aid in Latinos with limited English proficiency: Results from a pre-post trial and four month follow-up survey

BACKGROUND Compared with non-Latinos, Latinos in the US have low rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and low rates of knowledge regarding CRC screening tests and guidelines. Spanish speaking Latinos have particularly low CRC screening rates and screening knowledge. Our purpose was twofold: (1) to evaluate the effect of a computer-based, Spanish-language CRC screening decision aid on scre...

متن کامل

Tailored information increases patient/physician discussion of colon cancer risk and testing: The Cancer Risk Intake System trial

Assess whether receipt of tailored printouts generated by the Cancer Risk Intake System (CRIS) - a touch-screen computer program that collects data from patients and generates printouts for patients and physicians - results in more reported patient-provider discussions about colorectal cancer (CRC) risk and screening than receipt of non-tailored information. Cluster-randomized trial, randomized...

متن کامل

Association between features of patient-provider discussions and routine prostate-specific antigen testing

INTRODUCTION Although the US Preventive Services Task Force recommends against routine prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, specialty organizations support screening via shared decision making between providers and selected patients. While discussions about advantages and disadvantages of testing are a feature of patient-centered care, it is unclear how provid...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 2  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015